KING RICHARD III Remains Confirmed Found

KING RICHARD III
Remains Confirmed Found February 4th 2013
Post Created by the secret keeper
(Not at all like Shakespeare’s Richard III)
02.04.13

King Richard III Skeleton

King Richard III’s Skeleton

KING RICHARD III
REMAINS ARE CONFIRMED AS FOUND
4th February 2013:

At an historic press conference on the morning of 4 February, the University of Leicester revealed evidence from The Greyfriars dig and confirmed that the human remains of King Richard III had been positively identified.

They revealed a range of supporting evidence:
DNA analysis
Radiocarbon dating
Skeletal examination:
Proving the identity of the skeleton.

Key points are:

•DNA from skeleton matches two of Richard III’s maternal line relatives. Leicester genealogist verifies living relatives of Richard III’s family

•Individual likely to have been killed by one of two fatal injuries to the skull – one possibly from a sword and one possibly from a halberd

•Ten wounds discovered on skeleton – Richard III killed by trauma to the back of the head. Part of the skull sliced off

•Radiocarbon dating reveals individual had a high protein diet – including significant amounts of seafood – meaning he was likely to be of high status

•Radiocarbon dating reveals individual died in the second half of the 15th or in the early 16th century – consistent with Richard’s death in 1485

•Skeleton reveals severe scoliosis – onset believed to have occurred at the time of puberty

•Although around 5 feet 8 inches tall (1.72m), condition meant King Richard III would have stood significantly shorter and his right shoulder may have been higher than the left

•Feet were truncated at an unknown point in the past, but a significant time after the burial

•Corpse was subjected to ‘humiliation injuries’ – including a sword through the right buttock

•Individual had unusually slender, almost feminine, build for a man – in keeping with contemporaneous accounts

•No evidence for ‘withered arm’ – as portrayed by Shakespeare – found

•Possibility that the individual’s hands were tied

•Grave was hastily dug, was not big enough and there was no shroud or coffin.

Richard Buckley, the lead archaeologist for the Search for Richard III project said: ‘It is the academic conclusion of the University of Leicester that the individual exhumed at The Greyfriars in August 2012 is indeed King Richard III, the last Plantagenet King of England.’

By JILL LAWLESS, AP
@3pm EST February 4th 2013
King Richard III Remains Confirmed Found

King Richard III

King Richard III

LEICESTER, England — He was king of England, but for centuries he lay without shroud or coffin in an unknown grave, and his name became a byword for villainy.

On Monday, scientists announced they had rescued the remains of Richard III from anonymity — and the monarch’s fans hope a revival of his reputation will soon follow.

In a dramatically orchestrated news conference, a team of archaeologists, geneticists, genealogists and other scientists from the University of Leicester announced that tests had proven what they scarcely dared to hope — a scarred and broken skeleton unearthed under a drab municipal parking lot was that of the 15th-century king, the last English monarch to die in battle.

Lead archaeologist Richard Butler said that a battery of tests proved “beyond reasonable doubt” that the remains were the king’s.

Lin Foxhall, head of the university’s school of archaeology, said the discovery “could end up rewriting a little bit of history in a big way.”

Few monarchs have seen their reputations decline as much after death as Richard III. He ruled England between 1483 and 1485, during the decades-long battle over the throne known as the Wars of the Roses, which pitted two wings of the ruling Plantagenet dynasty — York and Lancaster — against one another.

His brief reign saw liberal reforms, including the introduction of the right to bail and the lifting of restrictions on books and printing presses.

But his rule was challenged, and he was defeated and killed by the army of Henry Tudor, who took the throne as King Henry VII and ended the Plantagenet line. Britain’s current monarch, Queen Elizabeth II, is distantly related to Richard, but is not a descendant.

After his death, historians writing under the victorious Tudors comprehensively trashed Richard’s reputation, accusing him of myriad crimes — most famously, the murder of his two nephews, the “Princes in the Tower.”

William Shakespeare indelibly depicted Richard as a hunchbacked usurper who left a trail of bodies on his way to the throne before dying in battle, shouting “My kingdom for a horse.”

That view was repeated by many historians, and Richard remains a villain in the popular imagination. But others say Richard’s reputation was unjustly smeared by his Tudor successors.

Philippa Langley of the Richard III Society — which seeks to restore the late king’s reputation and backed the search for his grave_ said that for centuries Richard’s story has been told by others, many of them hostile.

She hopes a new surge of interest, along with evidence from the skeleton about how the king lived and died — and how he was mistreated after death — will help restore his reputation.

“A wind of change is blowing, one that will seek out the truth about the real Richard III,” she said.

Langley, who helped launch the search for the king, said she could scarcely believe her quest had paid off.

“Everyone thought that I was mad,” she said. “It’s not the easiest pitch in the world, to look for a king under a council car park.”

The location of Richard’s body was unknown for centuries. He died in August 1485 at the Battle of Bosworth Field in the English Midlands, and records say he was buried by the Franciscan monks of Grey Friars at their church in Leicester, 100 miles (160 kilometers) north of London.

The church was closed and dismantled after King Henry VIII dissolved the monasteries in 1538, and its location eventually was forgotten by most local residents.

There were tales that the king’s bones had been dug up and thrown in a nearby river in the 16th century.

Then last year a team led by University of Leicester archaeologist Richard Buckley identified a possible location of the grave through map regression analysis, starting with a current map of the general area of the former church and analyzing earlier maps to discover what had changed and not changed. Ground-penetrating radar was used to find the best places to start digging.

The team began excavating in a parking lot last August. Within a week they had located thick walls and the remains of tiled floors. Soon after, they found human remains — the skeleton of an adult male who appeared to have died in battle.

He had been buried unceremoniously, with no coffin or shroud — plausible for a despised and defeated enemy.

Increasingly excited, the researchers set out to conduct a battery of scientific tests, including radiocarbon dating to determine the skeleton’s age, to see whether, against the odds, they really had found the king.

They found the skeleton belonged to a man in his late 20s to late 30s who died between 1455 and 1540. Richard was 32 when he died in 1485.

Archaeological bone specialist Jo Appleby, a lecturer in human bioarchaeology at Leicester, said study of the bones provided “a highly convincing case for identification of Richard III.”

Appleby said the 10 injuries to the body were inflicted by weapons such as swords, daggers and halberds and were consistent with accounts of Richard being struck down in battle — his helmet knocked from his head — before his body was stripped naked and flung over the back of a horse in disgrace.

Appleby said two of the blows to the head could have been fatal. Other scars, including a knife wound to the buttock, bore the hallmarks of “humiliation injuries” inflicted after death.

The remains also displayed signs of scoliosis, a form of spinal curvature, consistent with contemporary accounts of Richard’s appearance, though not the withered arm Shakespeare describes.

DNA from the skeleton matched a sample taken from Michael Ibsen, a distant living relative of Richard’s sister. The project’s lead geneticist, Turi King, said Ibsen, a Canadian carpenter living in London, shares with the skeleton a rare strain of mitochondrial DNA. The same DNA group also matches a second living descendant, who wants to remain anonymous.

King said that between 1 and 2 percent of the population belongs to this genetic sub-group, so the DNA evidence is not definitive proof in itself of the skeleton’s identity. But combined with the archaeological evidence, it left little doubt the skeleton belonged to Richard.

Ibsen, a 17th great-grand-nephew of Richard’s older sister, said he was “stunned” by the discovery.

“It’s difficult to digest,” he said.

Some scientists felt qualms about the haste with which the Leicester team announced its results. The findings have not been published in peer-reviewed scientific journals, though the university said they soon would be.

“It’s a bizarre way of going about things,” said Mark Horton, a professor of archaeology at the University of Bristol — although he said “overwhelming circumstantial evidence” identified the skeleton as Richard’s.

Archaeologist Mike Pitts, editor of British Archaeology magazine, also said he found the evidence persuasive.

“I don’t think there is any question. It is Richard III,” said Pitts, who was not affiliated with the research team.

The discovery is a boon for the city of Leicester, which has bought a building next to the parking lot to serve as a visitor center and museum.

On Monday, the king’s skeleton lay in a glass box in a meeting room within the university library. It was a browned, fragile-looking thing, its skull pocked with injuries, missing its feet — which scientists say were disturbed sometime after burial — and with a pronounced s-shape to the spine.

Soon the remains will be moved to an undisclosed secure location, and next year Richard will, at last, get a king’s burial, interred with pomp and ceremony in Leicester Cathedral.

It is a day Langley, of the Richard III Society, has dreamed of seeing.

“We have searched for him, we have found him — it is now time to honor him,” she said.


Medieval Music Beautiful

10 thoughts on “KING RICHARD III Remains Confirmed Found

  1. I posted this event on my FB page also. It is so exciting. Perhaps Shakespeare’s portrayal of him will be challenged. The last of the Plantagenets buried under a car park in Leicester; Killed at the Battle of Bosworth at the final battle of the War of the Roses faught between Lancastrians and Tudors; such history!

    Like

    • It is quite exciting. I’ve been reading about it all afternoon after I came on the story purely by accident while searching out something I have totally forgotten about. This caught my attention and imagination. All these years thinking he was such a scoundrel only to find out he was maligned throughout history and through Shakespeare’s play Richard III, which I have seen many times, including the Olivier version. He played him brilliantly but what a son-of-a-bitch he was made out to be. This shall shake up the history books for sure. As I’ve always thought and felt that history is not accurate for it is those that are defeated who are misrepresented by the victors. I will have to check out your FB page. I sent over to mine a link to this post. Great mines thinking the same thoughts. I could not pass up posting this on the secret keeper. It is such a perfect revelation. I read everything they posted on the Richard III Society page. All so fascinating. I’ve always been fascinated with Western Civilization and particularly Great Britain’s history and the Royal Line. What a monumental day. I wonder how the present Royal Family the Windsor’s feel and think about all of this coming to fruition. jk

      Like

  2. History is writ by those who survive it, which means there is scant truth in it from either side. Was Shakespeare’s Richard painted a villain? Of course. Shakespeare was living in the time of a Tudor sovereign. His historical references would have been limited and he would not have wanted to offend the queen by whose grace the Globe was kept open and her players employed. At best we can say that history is grey as the mist over Bosworth Field. No black and white, heroes and villains, especially not in what was essentially a civil war – the messiest of messy conflicts.

    Like

Leave a Comment

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s